Template:Did you know nominations/Maciej Grabowski (economist)
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Bruxton talk 22:52, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Maciej Grabowski (economist)
- ... that Maciej Grabowski became the Polish Minster of Environment in 2013 despite never having environmental experience? Source: Wszystko, co powinieneś wiedzieć o nowych ministrach. "Za młody, bierny, zbyt wyluzowany" (in Polish)
- Reviewed:
- Comment: QPQ not required, 5th nom. Always open to suggestions
Created by Kline (talk). Self-nominated at 22:27, 14 December 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Maciej Grabowski (economist); consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
- Date, size, refs, all good. I have mild concerns about the hook's neutrality, plus - it is mind numbingly boring IMHO (and true for a lot of politicians in similar positions worldwide). I am passing it as I can't think of anything more interesting in this very down-to-earth-boring-politician biography, and the implied criticism is also pretty tame. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:38, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Kline: I agree with @Piotrus: that the hook is not interesting. It also requires research within the sources to confirm the claim as none explicitly state it. Bruxton (talk) 20:18, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Bruxton:, @Piotrus:, you guys can just decline the hook if so, because there’s no way in hell I’d be able to find another hook. Kline • talk to me! • contribs 20:51, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- Bruxton, I did check the sources and it is mentioned there. I am not declining the nom as I don't think it is possible to get a more interesting hook about this pretty boring (to me) topic (don't take it as criticism, Wikipedia needs those kind of articles too). But since you voted, I am not sure what that means for the review. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:24, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Piotrus: I won't close this, but I will leave it for another promotor. Bruxton (talk) 03:38, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- In this source I see
At the Ministry of Finance, Grabowski was responsible for tax issues, he is not a specialist in geology or ecology. He is a maritime navigator and economist by profession. Lack of knowledge about the environment is cited as its biggest disadvantage.
So I guess that is the support for the
part of the hook. Bruxton (talk) 22:48, 26 December 2023 (UTC)despite never having environmental experience?
- In this source I see
- @Piotrus: I won't close this, but I will leave it for another promotor. Bruxton (talk) 03:38, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- Bruxton, I did check the sources and it is mentioned there. I am not declining the nom as I don't think it is possible to get a more interesting hook about this pretty boring (to me) topic (don't take it as criticism, Wikipedia needs those kind of articles too). But since you voted, I am not sure what that means for the review. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:24, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Bruxton:, @Piotrus:, you guys can just decline the hook if so, because there’s no way in hell I’d be able to find another hook. Kline • talk to me! • contribs 20:51, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Kline: I agree with @Piotrus: that the hook is not interesting. It also requires research within the sources to confirm the claim as none explicitly state it. Bruxton (talk) 20:18, 17 December 2023 (UTC)