Template:Did you know nominations/Makode Linde

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 03:37, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Makode Linde

edit

Makode Linde

Created by BabbaQ (talk). Self nominated at 13:19, 1 October 2014 (UTC).

  • Review: Long enough, the sources are OK. but not brilliant, you might find more science on the web. I think the hook is not adequate, the cake is about much more. The reference to genital cutting is lacking e.g. Serten (talk) 20:01, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
I approve ALT1. Article is long enough. New enough. The picture is PD. The hook is cited. AGF on the Swedish sources. Étienne Dolet (talk) 18:56, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Sorry, I can't understand ALT1 – it's vague and therefore doesn't intrigue me at all. Yoninah (talk) 19:27, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Made a ALT2 hook as well :)--BabbaQ (talk) 19:57, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
  • The hook cite for ALT2 isn't working. Yoninah (talk) 21:14, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
Fixed.--BabbaQ (talk) 22:09, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Thank you. Article is new enough, long enough, well referenced, no close paraphrasing seen. QPQ done. Image is pd. It is my understanding that you are giving co-credit to User:Werldwayd and User:GoingBatty for this article and not for Anna Odell, so I adjusted the credits. I disagree with Serten's comment about adding any more to the hook; we've had our fill of pornography on the main page for the time being. ALT2 is fine, hook ref verified and cited inline. ALT2 good to go. Yoninah (talk) 22:33, 25 October 2014 (UTC)