Template:Did you know nominations/Manuel Komnenos (son of Andronikos I)

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 19:31, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Manuel Komnenos (son of Andronikos I)

(

)

... that although he was the oldest son of Byzantine emperor Andronikos I Komnenos, Manuel Komnenos was not named as heir, as he opposed his father's policies? Source: Varzos 1984b p. 518: "Για τον Μανουήλ Κ. 161 μαθαίνομε πως απ' την αρχή που ανέλαβε την εξουσία ο πατέρας του, αντιτάχτηκε στην πολιτική του και πως καθόλου δε συμφωνούσε με τα 'ανομήματά' του" p. 520: "ανάδειξε σε βασιλέα κάτω απ' την ροπή του προαγορεύματος ΑΙΜΑ το δευτερότοκο γιο του Ιωάννη Κ. 162, κι όχι τον πρωτότοκο Μανουήλ Κ. 161, και λόγω του προαγορεύματος αλλά και γιατί αυτός ο δεύτερος αποδοκίμαζε την πολιτική του κια απεχθανόταν τα έργα του."

Reviewed: Johannes Chum

Improved to Good Article status by Cplakidas (talk). Self-nominated at 10:11, 15 November 2020 (UTC).

Starting review —valereee (talk) 15:59, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: —valereee (talk) 15:59, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Hook support sentence needs a citation: Although widely acknowledged as more capable than his brother, Manuel was bypassed due to his opposition, although officially his father justified this choice with following the AIMA prophecy —valereee (talk) 15:59, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

@Valereee: reference added directly after the sentence, and QPQ done. Constantine ✍ 08:33, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Good to go! —valereee (talk) 10:18, 18 November 2020 (UTC)