Template:Did you know nominations/Marija Krucifiksa Kozulić
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 14:47, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Marija Krucifiksa Kozulić
edit
Marija Krucifiksa Kozulić
- ... that Marija Krucifiksa Kozulić (pictured) founded the order of the Daughters of the Sacred Heart of Jesus in 1899, the only community of nuns established by a native Croatian in the Archdiocese of Rijeka?
- ALT1:.. that Marija Krucifiksa Kozulić (pictured) founded the Institute of the Sacred Heart of Jesus in 1895, which accepted children regardless of their religious affiliation or ethnicity?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Cassazione (Sibelius)
- Comment: For WikiProject Women in Red's Women in Religion editathon
Created by SusunW (talk) and Nvvchar (talk). Nominated by SusunW (talk) at 22:11, 6 December 2015 (UTC).
Thank you for an interesting biography on good sources, Italian and Croation sources accepted AGF. Image is good and free. Both hooks are sourced, but I like the ALT much better,character vs.mere location ;) - Can you add a year? I think this is common practise now but was probably extraordinary in the 19th century. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:06, 10 December 2015 (UTC)- ps: please check the order of ref numbers, and perhaps drop "Roman", the article is simply Catholic Church, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:08, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you for the review Gerda Arendt. Hopefully I have addressed your concerns. SusunW (talk) 18:41, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, but thinking further: do we really need the long name of the institution? perhaps just "institute devoted to the Sacred Heart? And her name? Could we say - as the header of a source, "Sister Krucifiksa"? The full name will be in the image caption.
- If we aren't putting the name, I'd rather call it a kindergarten or school, as an Institute smacks of institution, which can have negative connotations. I know that it is common in church culture to call sisters by their first names, but it rankles my southern sensibilities and seems overly familiar, rather than professional. However, assuming that might be construed as POV, I'll compromise. What about:
- ALT1:.. that Sister Krucifiksa (pictured) founded in 1895 a school dedicated to the Sacred Heart, which accepted children regardless of their religious affiliation or ethnicity? SusunW (talk) 20:30, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
lovely, may she be Blessed ;) - I moved the year a bit, to have less "distance" between school and the children, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:39, 10 December 2015 (UTC)- ps: thank you for the qpq review: that article received 2.2k hits in 10 hours, - a lot for a piece of classical music, just for mentioning James Bond, - more than the other two with a picture of Sibelius (which were also not bad) ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:50, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
- If we aren't putting the name, I'd rather call it a kindergarten or school, as an Institute smacks of institution, which can have negative connotations. I know that it is common in church culture to call sisters by their first names, but it rankles my southern sensibilities and seems overly familiar, rather than professional. However, assuming that might be construed as POV, I'll compromise. What about:
- Yes, but thinking further: do we really need the long name of the institution? perhaps just "institute devoted to the Sacred Heart? And her name? Could we say - as the header of a source, "Sister Krucifiksa"? The full name will be in the image caption.
- Thank you for the review Gerda Arendt. Hopefully I have addressed your concerns. SusunW (talk) 18:41, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
