Template:Did you know nominations/Mary Clutter

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 23:00, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Mary Clutter

(

)

... that Mary Clutter created a women's caucus in the American Association for the Advancement of Science in 1971 and a Women In Science office to promote accomplishments of women scientists? Source: "Obituary: ASPB Pioneer Member Mary E. Clutter" - American Society of Plant Biologists
- ALT1: ... that Mary Clutter used her directorial position at the National Science Foundation to require scientific conferences to include women speakers when presenting research done by them? Source: "Women's Place: On The Podium" - Washington Post
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Thomas Fritzsch
- Comment: Moved to mainspace with this edit

Created by Silver seren (talk). Self-nominated at 03:47, 7 January 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Mary Clutter; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall:

Article is new enough (four days old at the time of nomination) and clearly long enough. Article is neutral in tone and well cited. The hook is interesting, appears in the article and is cited. Earwig's copyvio tool scored 1% so plagiarism is highly unlikely. Picture criteria do not apply as the hook has no picture. QPQ has been done. JIP | Talk 13:08, 11 February 2024 (UTC)