Template:Did you know nominations/Marylebone Lane

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:15, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Marylebone Lane

edit
Marylebone Lane
Marylebone Lane

Created by Philafrenzy (talk). Self-nominated at 11:12, 22 November 2016 (UTC).

  • New enough (created same day as nominated) and long enough (>2500), the article is well referenced with many inline citations, hook is referenced and within size, no neutrality or copyright issues detected. Photo has been at Commons for five months and is nominator's own work. I did find all the redlinks distracting. Most don't appear to be notable to ever have articles, I would suggest they be removed. Will be good after QPQ. MB 03:04, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Thanks, I will do the QPQ shortly. I don't agree about the red links, they are all notable and I will be creating the articles to prove it soon! Philafrenzy (talk) 11:16, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
@Philafrenzy: Your QPQ is still needed here. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:21, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Thanks, QPQ done. Philafrenzy (talk) 18:43, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
GTG as the QPQ was the only holdup (all the red now gone). —David Eppstein (talk) 08:25, 15 December 2016 (UTC)