Template:Did you know nominations/Micronations and the Search for Sovereignty
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: withdrawn by nominator, closed by Theleekycauldron (talk) 15:33, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Micronations and the Search for Sovereignty
- ... that the book Micronations and the Search for Sovereignty is one of the earliest published books to focus largely on the legal aspects of micronations? Source: https://shimajournal.org/article/10.21463/shima.159.pdf
Improved to Good Article status by LunaEatsTuna (talk). Nominated by Onegreatjoke (talk) at 03:08, 13 May 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Micronations and the Search for Sovereignty; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook eligibility:
- Cited:
- Interesting:
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Article meets all eligibility criteria. Surprised that no one has picked this up for review close to a month after the nomination. Re: the sourcing for the hook, the journal link draws on a feature review by a reviewer (academic) in the journal. Specifically, it draws on these two lines I presume -- Despite the increasing number of articles regarding micronations being published, thereis a dearth of books regarding this topic. Therefore, Hobbs & Williams’ Micronations-and-the-Search-for-Sovereignty (202)shouldbewelcomed as a building block for research into micronations as it provides an in depth examination of this phenomenon.
. Two questions to the nominator: Does this review of the book by an academic reviewer suffice to say that this is one of the earliest books on the topic? Also, I am good with this hook, but, can we do something here to increase its appeal to a relatively lay audience? I will defer to the nominator on the second question on interestingness. Nice work. Ktin (talk) 04:47, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
- A ping to Onegreatjoke. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 18:41, 3 July 2023 (UTC)