Template:Did you know nominations/Microsoft v. AT&T
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:50, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
Microsoft v. AT&T
edit( )
- ... that in Microsoft v. AT&T, copying and installing software abroad onto foreign-manufactured computers were not considered as patent infringement under U.S. Patent Law?
Created/expanded by Wulingqi (talk). Nominated by Dc.to.daylight (talk) at 03:13, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
5x expansion has not been done in enough time. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 12:23, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
Thine Antique Pen is correct on the technicality. Both editor and nominator are newbies to Wikipedia. The article is about a case decided by the United States Supreme Court. As an FYI, in case anyone can find cause to give this a second look:
- Wulingqi is a new editor as of September 2012
- Article created by Jmcneill2 on May 1, 2007 as a one-sentence stub
- July 31, 2012, article had 831 characters of readable prose
- 13.65X expansion by Wulingqi on October 17, 2012, first day of expanding, brought the article to 11,349 characters of readable prose
- Wulingqi has continued to improve the article since that date
- Article currently has 12,019 characters of readable prose
- — Maile (talk) 15:11, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
- Actually,
good to go per WP:DYKSG#D9. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 15:17, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
- Actually,
