- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 23:28, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Moylough Belt-Shrine
The Moylough Belt-Shrine
- ... that the 8th century Irish reliquary known as the Moylough Belt-Shrine (pictured) was found 1945 by a workman while cutting turf? Source: Ó Floinn, Raghnal. The Moylough Belt-Shrine. In: Fenwick, Joe (ed), "Lost and Found: Discovering Ireland's Past". Dublin: Worldwell, 2003. ISBN 978-1-9055-6922-9. p.8-9
Created by Ceoil (talk). Self-nominated at 00:23, 29 December 2021 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
| Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
|
|
|
Overall: 
Looks good. The Internet Archive has a copy of the 2003 book you cite, which requires registration to view. I've read it and I've linked it in the article; facts confirmed although there was a minor glitch in the quote ("must have been" rather than "would have been"). However, I'm a bit confused by your page numbers, which don't match those in the IA's copy. I see the pages of this chapter as 197-206? Blythwood (talk) 20:54, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
- Hi Blythwood, I bought a pamphlet in the holding museum (where the author, Ó Floinn, works) a few weeks back, which was basically the chapter published separately, so my p.7 is the same as your p. 197. The isbn is 978-1-9055-69225-9...prob I'll switch to mine as easiest. Ceoil (talk) 21:07, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
- Ah, that's perfect. In that case I'm happy to pass. It's probably better to have the citation to a book the IA have digitised and which seems to be more widely available (I'm not seeing your ISBN on online catalogues) so I've switched the page numbers and references to the full book edition.
- Great, thank you for that. Ceoil (talk) 22:50, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
To T:DYK/P3
Looks good. The Internet Archive has a copy of the 2003 book you cite, which requires registration to view. I've read it and I've linked it in the article; facts confirmed although there was a minor glitch in the quote ("must have been" rather than "would have been"). However, I'm a bit confused by your page numbers, which don't match those in the IA's copy. I see the pages of this chapter as 197-206? Blythwood (talk) 20:54, 29 December 2021 (UTC)