Template:Did you know nominations/Mr. Darcy's Daughters

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 02:59, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Mr. Darcy's Daughters

edit

5x expanded by Ruby2010 (talk). Self-nominated at 02:35, 1 June 2016 (UTC).

  • @Ruby2010: New enough, long enough, meets core referencing and POV policies. The hook is well formatted, and short enough, and it caught my eye! (sorry for picking this up so early). However, I don't particularly like the phrasing "has been classified" in either the article or the hook, as it is very vague. You don't have to mention the specific people, but if you added the phrase "by several commentators", I would be fine. QPQ not done, but you have time to do that. No image to review. Johanna(talk to me!) 15:50, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Thanks so much for reviewing, Johanna! I've added "by several commentators" to the article and above hook. I will add my QPQ shortly and respond here when done. QPQ now added. Ruby 2010/2013 15:47, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
  • This nomination seems to have stalled. The QPQ has now been done and the hook amended. Everything else seems to have been covered in the original review. Giving it an AGF tick because the hook fact is supported by one online citation and one offline. Good to go. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:17, 18 June 2016 (UTC)