- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:54, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
NGC 6067
edit
5x expanded by Casliber (talk) and VirtualDave (talk). Nominated by Casliber (talk) at 15:13, 16 June 2015 (UTC).
- Prose portion expansion, ~1548 vs. ~277, so expanded enough and large enough (just).
- Article is: neutral and well cited. It has been run through Earwig's copyvio and is clear ("violation unlikely: 20.6% confidence").
- QPQ checks out
- Hook is verified by the source, which is reliable; Well within character limit; and neutral.
- No images
- Query: I am not an astronomer and I don't know what you mean by "rich" in this context - could a link be supplied? Otherwise, it's good to go. —Noswall59 (talk) 22:07, 16 June 2015 (UTC).
- This section of the article Open cluster (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_cluster#Morphology_and_classification) has an explanation of "richness" of clusters.VirtualDave (talk) 23:32, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
- Okay, so it seems to be more about the "density" of stars. Well, I am not sure that the section you've provided is very explicit, but I think it might be worth providing a link to it in the hook. —Noswall59 (talk) 21:41, 20 June 2015 (UTC).
- This section of the article Open cluster (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_cluster#Morphology_and_classification) has an explanation of "richness" of clusters.VirtualDave (talk) 23:32, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
