- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Yoninah (talk) 00:08, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Withdrawn by nominator
DYK toolbox |
---|
Naem
edit- Reviewed: Grodziskie
Improved to Good Article status by Northamerica1000 (talk). Self-nominated at 15:21, 2 March 2016 (UTC).
- Although a recently promoted GA, this article unfortunately does not qualify because it was already featured for DYK on 16 April 2015. See the previous nomination page. -Zanhe (talk) 16:46, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
- @Zanhe: I was wondering about this before nominating. I could not find any rule anywhere at the DYK rules of supplementary rules about another DYK being forbidden when an article reaches GA. North America1000 18:25, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
- Per DYK rule 1e: "Articles that have featured (bold link) previously on DYK, or in a blurb on the main page's In the news, or On this day sections are ineligible." It doesn't matter if it's a GA or an expansion. I myself have written several articles that reached GA after being featured on DYK, and I've not renominated them. -Zanhe (talk) 18:53, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
- Withdrawn. Can't believe I missed that in the rules. North America1000 19:06, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
- Per DYK rule 1e: "Articles that have featured (bold link) previously on DYK, or in a blurb on the main page's In the news, or On this day sections are ineligible." It doesn't matter if it's a GA or an expansion. I myself have written several articles that reached GA after being featured on DYK, and I've not renominated them. -Zanhe (talk) 18:53, 2 March 2016 (UTC)