Template:Did you know nominations/Nag Hammadi Codex II

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PumpkinSky talk 19:56, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

Nag Hammadi Codex II

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that Nag Hammadi Codex II is only one complete manuscript of the Gospel of Thomas?

• Reviewed: Otium

Created by Leszek Jańczuk (talk). Self nom at 19:53, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Date, length, and sourcing are good. No neutrality or copyright issues. Hook source accepted in good faith, and meets all standards, provided "is only one complete" is changed to "is the only complete," since the latter is what the article says, and the former doesn't make a lot of sense. Image is PD and used in the article. Norstrem (talk) 23:32, 16 November 2011 (UTC)