Template:Did you know nominations/Narjis

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 21:57, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Narjis

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that Narjis converted to Islam by request of Mary and Fatimah, the daughter of Muhammad whom she saw in her dreams?

• ALT1:... that according to the Sibt ibn al-Jawzi and Ibn Talhah, the Sunni's narrators, Narjis had been known as Sawsan?
• ALT2:... that according to Allamah Majlesi in al-Ghaibah, Narjis was the Christian and the granddaughter of a Roman Caesar?

5x expanded by Saff V. (talk). Self-nominated at 11:43, 20 April 2016 (UTC).

• The article is long enough and was expanded 5x within the period determined by related criteria. The hook is within the article body and and is immediately cited to a reliable source. However, both the hook and the article needs to be copy edited before doing anything else. Mhhossein (talk) 04:27, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

• Mhhossein I copy edited the article. Please review and say your idea.Saff V. (talk) 11:53, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Saff V.: That's good now. I can't understand this sentence: "According to Kohlberg, there has been this idea among some Shias that Hasan al-Askari, the eleventh Shia Imam did not have any child and had not died; that he was the Qaem and the Mahdi who would go through two occultations." Can you clarify? Mhhossein (talk) 05:48, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

• Mhhossein I clarified the sentence in the article.Saff V. (talk) 06:54, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

That's better now. The last issue I see here is that the lead would better the representative of the whole article and for this you'd better add Amir-Moezzi's opinion to the body of the article and provide a summary of others narrations in the lead. --Mhhossein (talk) 15:08, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

• Mhhossein The lead changed. Saff V. (talk) 08:41, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

: That's acceptable now. Good to go with the original hook. --Mhhossein (talk) 11:10, 7 May 2016 (UTC)