- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:14, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
National Archives at Seattle
Created by SounderBruce (talk). Self-nominated at 06:57, 25 February 2020 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
QPQ: 
- Not done
Overall: 
New enough, long enough and seems excellently sourced. Seems neutral and Earwig's Copyvio Detector stands at 13%, so that's OK as well. Both hooks cited and interesting. Once QPQ is done it would be good to go. Xwejnusgozo (talk) 15:47, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
-
OK, looks good to go now. Xwejnusgozo (talk) 20:43, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
- Not done
New enough, long enough and seems excellently sourced. Seems neutral and Earwig's Copyvio Detector stands at 13%, so that's OK as well. Both hooks cited and interesting. Once QPQ is done it would be good to go. Xwejnusgozo (talk) 15:47, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
