- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 08:36, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Nerds 2.0.1
- ... that the documentary Nerds 2.0.1 and its book spin-off detail the history of the internet from the 1960s to 1998?
- Reviewed: 1959 Texas A&I Javelinas football team
- Comment: DYKcheck says that the article hasn't been expanded 5x, but it has. 5x would be 3,400 characters and it is currently 3,439 characters.
5x expanded by SL93 (talk). Self-nominated at 13:05, 13 November 2021 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
Hook eligibility:
- Cited:
- Interesting:
- Hook is not particularly interesting, see further comments below.
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall: 
Article is new enough and long enough (not sure what DYKcheck's problem is, but meets expansion requirement by 39 B). Earwig looks good and sourcing is solid. My only concern is that the hook is not particularly interesting; it merely tells the subject of the documentary and book. I think a more interesting hook could potentially mention the criticism of racial inequality, the praise saying it should be "in all libraries", criticism about the "entire swaths of the history of the Internet" missing from the book, or something like that. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 22:21, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
- PCN02WPS ALT1: "... that the documentary Nerds 2.0.1 has been criticized for racial inequality among the 50 featured internet pioneers?" SL93 (talk) 23:00, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
looks good to me, passing with preference for ALT1. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 23:12, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
- PCN02WPS I think I found out why DYKcheck messed up the character count. I used DYKcheck on an earlier version of the article and the tool highlighted a bunch of white space. I know that this was approved, but I thought this was interesting and could help it get promoted if someone complains. SL93 (talk) 23:23, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
