Template:Did you know nominations/New Brighton Tower

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 ^talk 11:19, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

New Brighton Tower

(

)

... that the Beatles played at New Brighton Tower (pictured) a total of 27 times, more than any venue except the Cavern Club?

Comment: This is my second nomination (I think)

5x expanded by Staceydolxx (talk). Self nominated at 19:18, 3 July 2013 (UTC).

The hook looks good, length and expansion are good. User is exempt from WP:QPQ. There are some close paraphrases, most of which are unavoidable name-related items, but it would be good to make another check against the sources, and more importantly, do a copyedit for grammar, punctuation and capitalization. Some of the reference links aren't accessible since they're through your library; a plain reference to the newspaper should be satisfactory, and can be accepted in good faith. I've removed the stub tag and have fixed some things, and will do more. With a little cleanup it will be fine. Acroterion (talk) 16:58, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
@Acroterion: I gave this a once over prior to Stacey moving it live and whilst it needs a good copyedit before reaching GA status, I thought this would fly through DYK. Do you have anything specific that needs cleaning up? I'll ask about and see if I can find a copyeditor in the meantime. Worm^TT(talk) 10:36, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

I found a lot of odd capitalizations, some closer-than-desirable paraphrasing (as I said, mostly related to names, so hard to completely eliminate) and awkward grammar on one section, which looked like a product of not enough proofreading, most of which I fixed. I planned to return and do some more cleanup on my own and haven't had a chance, and to see if it was just an isolated section that hadn't had enough attention. I'll make another pass through and see whether anything else causes concern. Acroterion (talk) 22:01, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

I've done some copyediting on my own, and don't have any remaining concerns. Acroterion (talk) 12:22, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Cheers, I did ask a couple of good copyeditors to have a look over it, but neither seemed to get back to me. Worm^TT(talk) 12:27, 11 July 2013 (UTC)