- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 04:19, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
New Jersey's 1927 biannual elections proposal
Improved to Good Article status by Wehwalt (talk). Nominated by Gerda Arendt (talk) at 20:39, 2 December 2022 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
Overall: 
@Gerda Arendt: Great article! Though just a mention but you aren't allowed to put links to other websites (such as wikitionary) in your hooks. Onegreatjoke (talk) 02:56, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Onegreatjoke: actually, under WP:DYKSG#E4, there's no reason Gerda shouldn't be allowed to use a Wiktionary link. If you want to try and change this, though, you're more than welcome to :) theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 04:18, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Reviewing... Onegreatjoke (talk) 23:29, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
@Gerda Arendt: Great article! Though just a mention but you aren't allowed to put links to other websites (such as wikitionary) in your hooks. Onegreatjoke (talk) 02:56, 3 December 2022 (UTC)