- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 04:01, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Nicole Kidman
Kidman at the 2018 San Diego Comic-Con
Improved to Good Article status by Film Enthusiast (talk). Self-nominated at 20:12, 30 January 2022 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
| Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
|
|
|
Overall: 
First of all, I can't believe Nicole Kidman's page is just now ending up on DYK. Second of all, nice job! Recent GA is long enough, well sourced and neutral. Hook is cited and interesting, and there's no copyvio. Pic is free, looks good and is in the article. This looks like the nominator's first DYK nom, so qpq isn't needed. This one's all good! BuySomeApples (talk) 02:11, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
To
T:DYK/P2
.jpg)
First of all, I can't believe Nicole Kidman's page is just now ending up on DYK. Second of all, nice job! Recent GA is long enough, well sourced and neutral. Hook is cited and interesting, and there's no copyvio. Pic is free, looks good and is in the article. This looks like the nominator's first DYK nom, so qpq isn't needed. This one's all good! BuySomeApples (talk) 02:11, 31 January 2022 (UTC)