Template:Did you know nominations/North Shore Towers

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by —Akrabbimtalk 16:46, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

North Shore Towers

edit

Improved to Good Article status by Epicgenius (talk). Self nominated at 03:44, 19 November 2014 (UTC).

  • I love the article, which is a topic I'm more than familiar with but learned a great deal about from the content here. The article appears to meet criteria and I'd go with ALT1, but the link provided in the article is dead. Furthermore, I'm not sure that the North Shore Towers Courier is the best kind of source for this kind of claim. Could a different hook use the details regarding energy independence? Alansohn (talk) 23:08, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Sorry it took me so long to reply. Sure, I will replace the reference within 12 hours or so. – Epicgenius (talk) 17:35, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
  • @Alansohn: I've made a new ALT2. Do you prefer that instead? Epicgenius (talk) 17:38, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
  • ALT2 is good to go. Alansohn (talk) 23:15, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Thank you for your approval. In the meantime, I also updated the link to Queens Courier, though even more reliable sources are to be found later. Epicgenius (talk) 00:21, 21 December 2014 (UTC)