- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 22:44, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
Novak v. City of Parma
Moved to mainspace by Tamzin (talk). Self-nominated at 12:08, 5 October 2022 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
Overall: 
@Tamzin: Good article! However, I feel as if the hook could be better because to me it feels like it's lacking in something. other than that everything is fine. Onegreatjoke (talk) 00:49, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Onegreatjoke: How about...
- ALT1: ... that The Onion said in a brief to the U.S. Supreme Court that "the federal judiciary is staffed entirely by total Latin dorks"?
- -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 15:44, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Tamzin: Better but i'd like a citation for this before I approve it. Onegreatjoke (talk) 01:36, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Onegreatjoke: Rachel Treisman, The man who wrote The Onion's Supreme Court brief takes parody very seriously, NPR (October 4, 2022) (quoting Amicus Br. of The Onion in Supp. of Pet'r, Novak v. City of Parma, No. 22-293 (U.S.), at 4). -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 01:39, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Tamzin: Alright then, approving nomination. Onegreatjoke (talk) 01:47, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
@Tamzin: Good article! However, I feel as if the hook could be better because to me it feels like it's lacking in something. other than that everything is fine. Onegreatjoke (talk) 00:49, 6 October 2022 (UTC)