Template:Did you know nominations/Occupational hazard

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by sstflyer 05:34, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Occupational hazard

edit
  • ... that occupational hazards can be as diverse as infectious diseases, asbestos, poison ivy, and noise?

Converted from a redirect by Emily Temple-Wood (NIOSH) (talk) and James Hare (NIOSH) (talk). Nominated by Emily Temple-Wood (NIOSH) (talk) at 20:07, 3 September 2015 (UTC).

  • This article replaces a redirect and is long enough and new enough. The article is neutral, does not close-paraphrase the sources, and has inline citations for the hook facts. A passing thought, the citations are virtually all to CDC/NIOSH sources, but it might be better to use a greater variety of sources. You don't need CDC to demonstrate that poison ivy or HIV is a hazard to workers, and other countries beside the USA have good source material too! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:15, 6 September 2015 (UTC)