- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 01:36, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
Old Dartmouth
Created by AdmiralAckbar1977 (talk). Self-nominated at 01:54, 22 October 2022 (UTC).
- @Chienlit: I removed a review from the nomination page as it was in the wrong place. If you are planning to review this article, please add it here and add detail that you have considered the DYK criteria above and add the relevant tick. Cowlibob (talk) 11:46, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
- Hello Cowlibob, I was a bit confused about procedure, but I thought the page was OK. I assume that the latest Graearms review renders my review as unnecessary. Thanks. Chienlit (talk)
General eligibility:
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
Overall:
Although the article was created 20 days ago, it has been 5 times expanded.
Graearms (
talk) 17:40, 22 October 2022 (UTC)