- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 05:20, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Olena Stepaniv
- ... that postcards were made of Olena Stepaniv (pictured) during the First World War, and in 1991, Lviv named a street after her? Source: "postcards", and "street named for her"
- Comment: Its a work in progress (since 3/3/22) - she seems to have been the first woman to be a Ukrainian Officer and 1 of three said to be the first women to serve with equality in a 20th century army
Created by Victuallers (talk). Self-nominated at 15:00, 5 March 2022 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
| Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
|
|
|
Overall: 
Sufficiently long, sourced, and neutral article. No copyvios detected. Interesting hook with reliable sources. However, I suggest specifying who is the "they" in the second part. TeenAngels1234 (talk) 20:50, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you @TeenAngels1234: I decided Lviv was "they" and I added the missing QPQ. Victuallers (talk) 17:55, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- @TeenAngels1234: Can you look again? I see you state NA for picfree when there is an image and AGF for the sourcing when you have noted the "reliable sources". If you are happy then you need to add ((subst:DYKtick)) to say you are but replacing my normal brackets with curly brackets. Victuallers (talk) 10:06, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Victuallers: Yeah. Sorry, by bad. I'm not into DYN, sorry. Hope it works now.TeenAngels1234 (talk) 20:59, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Victuallers and TeenAngels1234:
looks like has this article gone some heavy editing since this nomination was finalized; I see a large, unsourced paragraph and a lot of added language I'm not quite comfortable with. Can this be hammered out and re-ticked? theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 03:29, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
- It has been updated, and it looks fine to me now.--TeenAngels1234 (talk) 14:13, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
Sufficiently long, sourced, and neutral article. No copyvios detected. Interesting hook with reliable sources. However, I suggest specifying who is the "they" in the second part. TeenAngels1234 (talk) 20:50, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
