Template:Did you know nominations/One Million Monkeys Typing
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 16:30, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
One Million Monkeys Typing
- ... that a researcher called the community on short-lived collaborative writing website One Million Monkeys Typing "astonishingly harmonious"?
- Source: Klaiber 2014: "Netiquette styles vary considerably from platform to platform: while the social aesthetics of OMM prove astonishingly harmonious, Protagonize, for instance, seems to allow for more direct critique of creative work."
- ALT1 ... that in 2008, One Million Monkeys Typing had only about 600 "monkeys" typing?
- Source: Wilkinson 2008 (offline): "as of today [July 2008 when the article was published], there are over 600 monkeys."
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Dissolution Grip (1 of 2)
- Comment: The "short-lived" bit in alt0 is, I realize, a tad subjective and can be struck at the reviewer's discretion.
Improved to Good Article status by Bobamnertiopsis (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 87 past nominations.
—Collint c 00:14, 5 August 2024 (UTC).
Article is newly promoted to GA status and long enough. The article is written neutrally, well-sourced, presentable, and BLP-compliant. Earwig detects no plagiarism. The hooks are both cited and interesting, with ALT1 feeling hookier. QPQ has been done. Well done. gobonobo + c 01:26, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
