- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Capsulecap (talk) 19:07, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
One Vanderbilt
- ... that the developer of One Vanderbilt (pictured), New York City's fourth-tallest building, more than doubled its height by adding public space and improving nearby transit? Source: Herzenberg, Michael (January 8, 2020). "How One Vanderbilt Utilized Zoning Rights Enacted Under Mayor de Blasio". Spectrum News NY1. Technically, the height was restricted to 600 feet, but the building was planned to be taller from the start. The developer planned to take advantage of air rights granted by the city in exchange for public space and improved transit.
- ALT1:... that the developer of the 1,301-foot-tall (397 m) One Vanderbilt (pictured) more than doubled its height by adding public space and improving nearby transit? Source: See above
- ALT2:... that the developer of One Vanderbilt (pictured) and the New York City government were sued for $1.1 billion over air rights transfers that made One Vanderbilt taller? Source: Bagli, Charles V. (September 29, 2015). "Owner of Grand Central Sues Developer and City for $1.1 Billion Over Air Rights". The New York Times.
- ALT3:... that the owner of Grand Central Terminal sued the developer of One Vanderbilt (pictured) and the New York City government for $1.1 billion over air rights? Source: Same as above
- ALT4:...
that despite opening during the COVID-19 pandemic, One Vanderbilt (pictured) soon had New York City's most expensive office space?Source: "SL Green Asking Record $322 Per Square Foot at One Vanderbilt". The Real Deal New York. July 21, 2021. Technically, this was the most expensive offering for office space.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Basilico's
- Comment: more hooks later
Improved to Good Article status by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 19:40, 2 August 2021 (UTC).
This article is a newly promoted GA and meets the newness and length criteria. It's an elegant building and the image is appropriately licensed. The hook facts are cited inline and any of the hooks except ALT4 could be used, the article is neutral and I detected no copyright issues. A QPQ has been done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:11, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
To T:DYK/P5