Template:Did you know nominations/Ophidascaris robertsi
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet talk 09:59, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Ophidascaris robertsi
- ... that a woman was diagnosed with a rare lung infection when she actually had a roundworm in her brain? Source: [1]
- ALT1: ... that in June 2022, a neurosurgeon found a roundworm in someone's brain? Source: [2]
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Plant (2nd nomination)
Created by Axl (talk). Nominated by Pamzeis (talk) at 11:58, 2 September 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Ophidascaris robertsi; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
- I'd like to suggest specifying that the worm was 8 centimeters long. Aaron Liu (talk) 19:00, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
It should be clarified that the species is not a true worm in the biology sense (eg an Annelida), but a parasitic member of the roundworms (Nematoda)--Kevmin § 14:04, 3 September 2023 (UTC)- Additionally there is are only about 4 lines of prose on the species itself, while the majority of the article is on the medical case, so I'm reluctant to run with this article in its current state.--Kevmin § 14:18, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
- Hiya, Kevmin! Thanks for the review :) So, I've changed "worm" to "roundworm". (IDK if it resolves the issue; I have absolutely no knowledge about this topic.) I think the second point is more of a GA issue, since the information about the medical case is still encyclopaedic, but I'll see what I can do about it. (Again, I have absolutely no knowledge on this topic so bear with me.) Pamzeis (talk) 14:11, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
- OK, so I've added a bit of content, but due to my lack of technical knowledge on this subject area, I don't think I can add anymore (even the bits I did add I don't really understand well). Would ya mind letting me know if it's sufficient? Thanks. Pamzeis (talk) 13:29, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
Ive add material to the article at the invitation of Pamzeis, as such a new reviewer is now requested.--Kevmin § 17:30, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
- Long enough, new enough. ALT1 short enough and hookier than ALT0; perhaps "a patient" might be more encyclopedic than "someone", though that's a matter for the prep builder. No neutrality problems found, no copyright problems found, no maintenance problems found. QPQ done. Yahoo is a syndicated piece from Agence France-Presse; not a source I'd use, but it is usable per WP:RSP so not a DYK issue. Where is your source that says "Ophidascaris robertsi" is also known as roundworm?--Launchballer 13:09, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Launchballer: The linked NYT source, the Ars Technica source, and the Yahoo source (which I've replaced with its origin, which appears to be AP not AFP) all call it a type of roundworm. Aaron Liu (talk) 15:24, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
