- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 18:53, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Oscar van Hemel
edit.jpg)
Oscar van Hemel in 1962
- ... that the Dutch-Belgian composer Oscar van Hemel created two operas, one of them about a prostitute? Source: [1]
- ALT1:... that the Dutch-Belgian composer Oscar van Hemel was wounded in the Battle of Halen? Source: [2]
- Reviewed: Michaelbrent Collings
Created by Randykitty (talk). Self-nominated at 16:18, 7 March 2019 (UTC).
@Randykitty: Reviewing this - 2.5 years to finish up that userspace draft, eh?
- Where in source 1 does it mention "August de Boeck and Lodewijk Mortelmans" and the Dutch National Opera?
- Similarly, the first sentences of the first section looks sorta similar to source 1 - though I guess that's just because the sources provide pretty simple-to-state facts.
Otherwise, I prefer the original ALT and the other criteria are good to go. Juxlos (talk) 10:35, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
- @Juxlos: To be honest, I had completely forgotten about that draft in my userspace, until I stumbled upon it recently :-) As for your questions (good catch, BTW; ref numbers used are those in the version that you reviewed, they have changed subsequent to my corrections)): 1/ Dutch National Opera: that's indeed not in ref 1, I put the wrong one there, it's in ref 2 and also in ref 7 (corrected). 2/de Boek and Mortelmans: that was actually in none of the references listed... I' found a good reference, I think. As it doesn't say explicitly that this was at the Royal Conservatory, I put that ref behind Mortelmans' name and moved the bio reference up till after the conservatory. 3/ Similarity: personally I think this is different enough not to be "close paraphrasing", but if you like, I can try to reword it. As you say, there's only so many ways to present these basic facts. 4/ My preference is also for the original hook, not the ALT. Thanks for reviewing this, hope it's OK now! --Randykitty (talk) 16:28, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
