- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Lightburst (talk) 01:40, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Otoskwin River, Otoskwin-Attawapiskat River Provincial Park
( Back to T:TDYK )
( Article history links: )
- ... that the Otoskwin-Attawapiskat River Provincial Park, protecting the Otoskwin and Attawapiskat Rivers in Ontario, Canada, has archaeological and historical sites dating from 3000 BC to the 1800s? Source: Ref #4 (Otoskwin-Attawapiskat River Provincial Park Management Plan)
Created by P199 (talk). Self-nominated at 18:32, 26 April 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Otoskwin River; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
Reviewing... double nomination. Flibirigit (talk) 20:57, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- Review for Otoskwin River
Article created on April 24, and nominated on April 26, therefore it is new enough. The article is long enough at 1823 characters. The prose is properly cited, but the list of tributaries is uncited. The article is neutral in tone, and no plagiarism concerns were detected. The hook does not appear in this article, and will review in the second half of this nomination. The only image used in the article is a map, properly licensed on the Commons. The QPQ requirement is complete for a double nomination. Flibirigit (talk) 21:17, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- Review for Otoskwin-Attawapiskat River Provincial Park
Done Article created on April 25, and nominated on April 26, therefore it is new enough. The article is long enough at 1915 characters, and meets basic sourcing requirements. The article is neutral in tone, and no plagiarism concerns were detected. The proposed hook is interesting, properly mentioned and cited in this article, and verified by the cited source. The only image used in the article is a map, properly licensed on the Commons. The QPQ requirement is complete for a double nomination. Flibirigit (talk) 21:40, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Overall, this nomination looks to be in good shape. The only outstanding question is a citation for the list of tributaries on Otoskwin River. Thanks for the nomination. Flibirigit (talk) 21:42, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks @Flibirigit: for your review. I have added the reference for the tributaries (Atlas of Canada Toporama). Regards, -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:40, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
DYK review approved. Nomination now meets all criteria as per above. Flibirigit (talk) 14:15, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
