Template:Did you know nominations/Paškal Jukić

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 12:42, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Paškal Jukić

edit

Created by Antidiskriminator (talk), Timbouctou (talk), GregorB (talk) . Nominated by Antidiskriminator (talk) at 18:31, 21 October 2014 (UTC).

  • Note to reviewer: Please don't start the review before Oct 26 because I expect another editor to create an article on the aforementioned newspaper, so this can be turned into a double DYK hook.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 20:53, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  • The single hook is turned into double DYK hook which is ready to be reviewed.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 22:57, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Article is new enough, long enough, and appropriately referenced. The fact in the hook is in the article and is referenced.
Paškal Jukić:
Article is new enough, long enough, and appropriately referenced. AGF on the references I cannot access, but they do not concern the fact in the hook, which is referenced in the article.
QPQ review has been done, and both articles seem suitable. I cannot find evidence of copyright violations in any of the articles. Good to go. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 20:26, 29 October 2014 (UTC)