Template:Did you know nominations/Pachycondyla lutzi

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 11:04, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Pachycondyla lutzi

edit
fossil worker
fossil worker
  • ... that the one described worker (pictured) of the fossil ant Pachycondyla lutzi is missing its gaster?

Created by Kevmin (talk). Self-nominated at 04:23, 7 September 2015 (UTC).

  • New enough, hook is interesting enough (though I'd probably want to link gaster, it's a rare term to the layman), and article is in good shape (lead's pretty perfunctory but that's not a dealbreaker at DYK). AGF on the source used, as it's subscription-only, but it seems reliable and I see no reason to doubt it. GRAPPLE X 14:06, 10 September 2015 (UTC)