Template:Did you know nominations/Papyrus Oxyrhynchus 654
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Redtigerxyz Talk 06:48, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
Papyrus Oxyrhynchus 654, Papyrus Oxyrhynchus 655
edit( Back to T:TDYK )
( Article history links: )
- ... that P. Oxy. 654 and P. Oxy. 655 (pictured) are two of only three Greek manuscripts of the Gospel of Thomas?
- Reviewed: Hurricane Cindy (1959)
Created by Leszek Jańczuk (talk). Self nom at 23:01, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
- added pictured, will review later today, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:16, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
"654", 
"655". Offline sources AGF. 654 is a little short after I removed a word which was not needed. "Diaeresis" which I don't know takes me to a dab, perhaps a little explanation could go into the article? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:28, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry, I forget about this article, it has only 1496 characters in prose. I have added a small explanation for nomina sacra and it is always easy to change "P. Oxy. 1" into "Papyrus Oxyrhynchus 1", but probably it is too late. Thanks. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 12:31, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
- thanks, both now fine, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:01, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry, I forget about this article, it has only 1496 characters in prose. I have added a small explanation for nomina sacra and it is always easy to change "P. Oxy. 1" into "Papyrus Oxyrhynchus 1", but probably it is too late. Thanks. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 12:31, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
