- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:16, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Pastrami on rye
edit
A pastrami on rye sandwich
- ... that the pastrami on rye sandwich has come to be a symbol of the classic New York Jewish deli?
- Reviewed: List of accolades received by Bajirao Mastani
- Comment: This nomination is about 14 hours over the 7 day limit to nominate, but per D9 of the DYK supplementary rules, " "Seven days old" limit should be strictly enforced only if there is a large backlog of hooks. Otherwise nominated article may still be approved if it were created or expanded after the oldest date listed in Template talk:Did you know#Older nominations." The oldest date for a nominated article at the Older nominations section is 15 February 2016 (UTC) as of this post.
Created by Onel5969 (talk). Nominated by Northamerica1000 (talk) at 19:47, 2 April 2016 (UTC).
- interesting hook, well sourced(hook has 4 sources), interesting article drew me into reading the pastrami article as well before returning here.. images is appropriately licensed. Gnangarra 06:06, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Gnangarra: Thanks for reviewing. All of the points of the DYK rules at WP:WIADYK have not been denoted above, such as checks for copyright infringement and whether or not the article is new and long enough. Without a complete review, this is unlikely to move forward. North America1000 09:53, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
1. its new & not broken out of another article, nomination 14 hours past 7 day limit WP:IAR its different its close enough in the time frame and WP:AGF on meeting requirements of D9 (personal opinion some rules are pathetically bureaucratic on drawing hard lines when fuzzy commonsense should prevail) 2. its long enough, in that it tells the story effectively (personal opinion some rules are pathetically bureaucratic on drawing hard lines when fuzzy commonsense should prevail) 3. the hook is cited to 4 sources, 4. both images are cc-by, and theres no apparent copyright issues, it meets all the normal requirements of notability, verifiability etc whether it would stand up to a merge into Pastrami would depend on which cabal is running these discussions. As I said before its an interesting hook, its well sourced, the article drew me into reading an additional article, the images are appropriately licensed but now the pathetically bureaucratic rules have all been ticked off as well as expanded reasonings explained - Gnangarra 10:28, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
