Template:Did you know nominations/Pathetic dot theory
The following is an archived discussion of Pathetic dot theory's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you know
(talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.
(talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.
The result was: by Hawkeye7 (talk) 18:44, 19 March 2013 (UTC).
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Pathetic dot theory
edit- ... that Lawrence Lessig's pathetic dot theory stresses the importance of computer code in regulating our behavior?
- Reviewed: Polish culture in the Interbellum
Created by Piotrus (talk). Self nominated at 07:16, 19 March 2013 (UTC).
Long enough, within requisite time period, hook is fine. Only issue is that the refs have different date formats. They should be uniform, and the British is certainly not the choice to go with I would think, as national ties point to the US.--Epeefleche (talk) 07:59, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
