Template:Did you know nominations/Pendleton Dudley
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:05, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Pendleton Dudley
edit... that Pendleton Dudley refused to talk about the work he did to launch Woodrow Wilson's political career, because revelation of the details would be "damaging"?- ALT-1:
... that Pendleton Dudley refused to talk about the work he did to launch Woodrow Wilson's political career, because revelation of the details would be "damaging to our profession (public relations)"?
- ALT-1:
Created by DarjeelingTea (talk). Self-nominated at 01:33, 26 March 2017 (UTC).
. The article is new (created on 26 March) and it is also long enough. It cites sources with inline citations and is free of close paraphrasing issues. My concern is that the referred source does not fully substantiates the hook fact. According to the cited source (and the article), Dudley specified that the revelation of the details would be "damaging to our profession" (that is, to PR). However, the hook could easily be interpreted that the revelation would be damaging to Wilson's fame.Borsoka (talk) 14:44, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
- Borsoka - thanks for the catch, I meant to include that, not sure how I omitted it. Have proposed an Alt-1. DarjeelingTea (talk) 20:59, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
- ALT-2: ... that Pendleton Dudley refused to talk about the work he did to launch Woodrow Wilson's political career?
- Looks good to me, Borsoka! DarjeelingTea (talk) 20:25, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
. ALT-2 is good to go. Borsoka (talk) 00:46, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
