Template:Did you know nominations/Phylogenetic reconciliation

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: withdrawn by nominator, closed by Narutolovehinata5 (talk) 10:19, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Phylogenetic reconciliation

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that evolution can be studied across many levels of biological organisation—from nucleotides to organisms, holobionts and ecosystems—using a common method, phylogenetic reconciliation? Source: Wieseke, Nicolas; Bernt, Matthias; Middendorf, Martin (2013). "Unifying Parsimonious Tree Reconciliation". arXiv:1307.7831 [q-bio.QM].: "This opens up new possibilities for solving reconciliation problems for a variety of applications. Biogeography, gene tree/species tree, and host-parasite systems can be reconciled with the same algorithms while only the cost model γ differs. Beside that, further cases of application exists, e.g., general symbiotic systems or interactions of genes or gene products, where both association partners are equitable and a reconciliation can not be produced by simply embedding one tree into the other."
  • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Janet Sorg Stoltzfus
  • Comment: This article is a wikified version of the open-access article Menet H, Daubin V, Tannier E (2022) Phylogenetic reconciliation. PLoS Comput Biol 18(11): e1010621. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010621 that is available under CC BY 4.0.

Moved to mainspace by Daniel Mietchen (talk). Nominated by Daniel Mietchen (talk) at 18:09, 25 December 2022 (UTC).

• @Daniel Mietchen: Hi there! Couple things: first, unless the authors have verified wikipedia accounts, no need to give them DYK credit (it actually wouldn't work out technologically). Second, make sure your article has at least 1500 prose characters that are not copied from a freely licensed source, as work that isn't your own doesn't count towards DYK's length requirement. Thanks! theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 07:30, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
• @Daniel Mietchen: What's the status of this nomination? Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 10:09, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
  • @Narutolovehinata5: I'm withdrawing it. -- Daniel Mietchen (talk) 10:17, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Noted. Closing as withdrawn. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 10:19, 19 February 2023 (UTC)