- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:44, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Pigot Diamond
edit- ... that the Pigot Diamond was the largest diamond in England at the turn of the 19th century but its whereabouts today is unknown, although a popular legend says it was destroyed?
- ALT1:... that the Pigot Diamond was the largest diamond in England at the turn of the 19th century but its whereabouts today is unknown, although a popular legend says it was crushed to powder?
Created/expanded by MB (talk). Self-nominated at 15:42, 3 May 2016 (UTC).
size and age ok, written neutrally. Limited copyvio check (using links but not search engine) is clear. Has inline, formatted references. Most references offline. The hook, presumably from this sentence "The fate of the diamond after this time has not been established.", does not have an inline reference. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:33, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
- Inline citation to this sentence added. The last clause in the hook is from the sentence "Ali Pasha reportedly ordered that it be crushed to powder in his presence" which has citations. MB (talk) 14:35, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
- I think it would be a better hook ending as something about being "crushed to powder" Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:19, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- Added alternate hook. I agree it is more provocative. I don't know where the words "crushed to powder" originated - they are repeated over and over when the legend is told but since it's a legend there is no real source. "Destroyed" sounds more contemporary and encyclopedic. MB (talk) 16:46, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
