- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 04:36, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
Pixel 6
- ... that the Pixel 6 is the first smartphone to be powered by the Google Tensor system-on-chip (SoC)? Source: "This is Google's first main SoC in a smartphone, and the chip has a unique CPU core configuration and a strong focus on AI capabilities." (Ars Technica)
- Reviewed: This is my first DYK nomination, so if I understand correctly I am exempt from QPQ.
- Comment: Article created in draftspace on August 2, moved to mainspace on October 19.
Moved to mainspace by InfiniteNexus (talk). Self-nominated at 06:39, 20 October 2021 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
Overall: 
Article is new enough and long enough. The article is adequately sourced and eventhough it is about a product, it is written in neutral tone. Earwig checks out. The hook is interesting and checks out, although I think ref4 in the article is a better citation, as it mentioned everything stated in the hook. I tweak the hook a bit so it also wikilink to system-on-chip. Overall good to go. Note that I am a new reviewer so I do appreciate a second opinion from experienced reviewer. Lulusword (talk) 16:23, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Lulusword: I have swapped the ref per your comments. InfiniteNexus (talk) 18:41, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- Noted! Lulusword (talk) 15:24, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Promoting to
Prep 4 –
Kavyansh.Singh (
talk) 04:36, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
Article is new enough and long enough. The article is adequately sourced and eventhough it is about a product, it is written in neutral tone. Earwig checks out. The hook is interesting and checks out, although I think ref4 in the article is a better citation, as it mentioned everything stated in the hook. I tweak the hook a bit so it also wikilink to system-on-chip. Overall good to go. Note that I am a new reviewer so I do appreciate a second opinion from experienced reviewer. Lulusword (talk) 16:23, 30 October 2021 (UTC)