- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Hilst talk 10:29, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Pokémon Crystal
- ... that the Japanese version of Pokémon Crystal allowed players to trade and battle over mobile networks using an adapter (the Mobile System GB) packaged with the game? Source: Mobile System GB capabilities with Pokemon Crystal were listed by Nintendo on their website as archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20021106002754/http://www.nintendo.co.jp/n07/contents/mc_bxpj/index.html.
- Reviewed:
Improved to Good Article status by Vrxces (talk). Self-nominated at 03:12, 11 March 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Pokémon Crystal; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
- Article is neutral, free from copyvio, suitably referenced, and meets the required length—promoted to GA on 10 March, the day before this nomination. The hook is succinct, neutral, interesting, and reliably sourced—AGF on the foreign-language translation. I would recommend a slight trimming to add more impact:
- ALT0b: ... that the Japanese version of Pokémon Crystal allowed players to trade and battle over mobile networks using an adapter packaged with the game?
- User is exempt from QPQ. Not too sure on the image—I trust that the uploader received the correct permissions, but would feel much more confident if it was approved through VRT at Commons (@Vrxces: I recommend you consider this to avoid any complications). In any case, I'll leave it to the promoter. Besides that, this is good to go! – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 23:02, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Rhain:, apologies if I didn't do this correctly. The image owner completed the form at the VRT release generator and attached the file to an email granting the license. Were there any other steps I should have completed to ensure that this release is verifiable for other users? VRXCES (talk) 00:20, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Vrxces: No need to apologise! Did the image owner send the email to the VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org)? – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 00:59, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Rhain:, looks like they sent it to photosubmission@wikimedia.org. VRXCES (talk) 01:04, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Vrxces: Great! In that case, it might be worth adding {{Permission pending}} to the file page so the VRT can verify the email and license. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 01:16, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
- Image permission has been approved by VRT, so reinstating this tick with the image included. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 05:02, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Vrxces: Great! In that case, it might be worth adding {{Permission pending}} to the file page so the VRT can verify the email and license. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 01:16, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Rhain:, looks like they sent it to photosubmission@wikimedia.org. VRXCES (talk) 01:04, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Vrxces: No need to apologise! Did the image owner send the email to the VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org)? – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 00:59, 12 March 2024 (UTC)