Template:Did you know nominations/Poles in Bosnia and Herzegovina
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 11:23, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Poles in Bosnia and Herzegovina
edit- ... that the writer Maria Dąbrowska reported to the Polish authorities that Poles in Bosnia and Herzegovina lived better than villagers in Poland?
- ALT1:... that Polish colonists introduced synthetic fertilizers and non-food crops into the north of Bosnia?
- ALT2:... that 70 years after repatriation, Bosnian Poles and their descendants maintain certain aspects of Bosnian culture?
- Reviewed: 25 (Adele album)
Created by Surtsicna (talk). Self-nominated at 20:57, 21 October 2015 (UTC).
A large number of claims are cited to a Serbo-Croatian article. This is not in itself a problem, but a couple of the facts cited don't appear in this (the claim that "Their number fell to 1,161 by 1953 and further to 609 by 1981." is not substantiated). I think this is just an error with the reference, but I'd like to see that fixed. I don't see any signs of copyright violation, and the hooks are all correctly cited. A small point - File:Nowy Martyniec.jpg seems to have the wrong copyright tag (which refers to photographs, not drawings). Smurrayinchester 15:02, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for noticing the problem! The numbers are given by Hoare (page 343), but I somehow forgot to add the correct citation (leaving it instead under another). Can you suggest another copyright tag? Surtsicna (talk) 11:49, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
- Having looked at the picture, I don't think it was made before WWII. Hmm, you might want to ask someone on Commons for advice there. Smurrayinchester 11:23, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
- I will. I have removed it for now. Surtsicna (talk) 15:57, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
Looks good! (AGF because I don't speak Polish). Smurrayinchester 20:06, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
@Smurrayinchester: you should provide a review that explicitly confirms that the five main DYK criteria have been met. Yoninah (talk) 23:46, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
- I thought that was assumed but very well: 1 New enough (at the time of nomination it was 6 days old), 2 Long enough (well over 1500 characters), 3 All three hooks are cited. 4 Looks good from a copyright/citation perspective. 5 QPQ done. Smurrayinchester 08:58, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
- I will. I have removed it for now. Surtsicna (talk) 15:57, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
- Having looked at the picture, I don't think it was made before WWII. Hmm, you might want to ask someone on Commons for advice there. Smurrayinchester 11:23, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for noticing the problem! The numbers are given by Hoare (page 343), but I somehow forgot to add the correct citation (leaving it instead under another). Can you suggest another copyright tag? Surtsicna (talk) 11:49, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
