- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 23:03, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Polygala nana
edit
5x expanded by Casliber (talk). Self-nominated at 11:20, 18 July 2015 (UTC).
- The article is newly expanded.
- The article has not previously featured on the Main Page.
- The article is long enough.
- Citations are sufficient and drawn from reliable published sources.
- No disputes surround the article.
- I see nothing that might be construed as a BLP violation.
- I can find no particular issues with plagiarism. The wording appears original.
- I see no neutrality issues, either. This is a straightforward account.
- The article is not up for AfD.
- The Google Book source for the hook checks out. - Biruitorul Talk 15:02, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
