Template:Did you know nominations/Prodigy house

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Keilana (talk) 15:48, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Prodigy house

(

)

Wollaton Hall, Nottingham

... that in 1616 Ben Jonson described the prodigy houses (Wollaton Hall pictured) of his day as "proud, ambitious heaps", "built to envious show"?

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Heino Falcke and Template:Did you know nominations/Elena Cattaneo

5x expanded by Johnbod (talk). Self-nominated at 16:52, 1 August 2015 (UTC).

A considerable expansion of a small stub, certainly way more than 5x; I would judge as 11x; interesting topic and text; well referenced, well illustrated (image licenses & quality OK); the hook is referenced, and its poetic quote is right on. - üser:Altenmann >t 05:06, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Unless I'm significantly misunderstanding this poem, it appears the "built to envious show" refers to Penshurst, not to the prodigy houses. The hook appears to be incorrect in that respect. Also, a QPQ is still required unless you are exempt. ~ Rob^Talk 09:32, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

You are significantly misunderstanding this poem: "Thou art not, Penshurst, built to envious show, ...". I'm sure I did a qpq so I'll try to find it or do another. Johnbod (talk) 16:57, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Ah, I missed the first comma, which changes the meaning significantly. Just waiting on the QPQ, then. ~ Rob^Talk 17:35, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Thanks - qpq now done. Johnbod (talk) 12:56, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

The review you supplied does not mention the majority of the DYK criteria such as length, newness, neutrality, copyvios, close paraphrasing, hook cited in-line, QPQ, etc. Please complete a full review that mentions each of the DYK criteria on the preview screen. ~ Rob^Talk 15:46, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

"Good to go" means those have been checked. Johnbod (talk) 17:05, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

See response at the QPQ. ~ Rob^Talk 17:29, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Afaik there is no requirement for this. Congratulations on your upcoming 1 month anniversary on Wikipedia btw. Johnbod (talk) 00:21, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

I'm approaching three, actually. I'll post a discussion at WT:DYK, but it is standard practice to require full reviews. ~ Rob^Talk 03:50, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Done a 2nd qpq Johnbod (talk) 15:30, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

QPQ complete; restoring tick. ~ Rob^Talk 16:08, 25 August 2015 (UTC)