- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 20:01, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Project Y
edit- ... that Project Y designed an atomic bomb that used explosive lenses (depicted) to focus an explosion onto a sphere?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Alice of Champagne
- Comment: Hook in Footnote 145
Created by Hawkeye7 (talk). Self-nominated at 12:56, 29 August 2016 (UTC).
- ✓ This article is new and was created on 23:04, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
- ✓ This article meets the DYK criteria at 73562 characters
- ✗ Paragraphs [10] (Oppenheimer ... 300.),[25] (A ... Nelson:) in this article lack a citation.
- ✓ This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
- ✓ A copyright violation is unlikely according to automated metrics (12.3% confidence; confirm)
- Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
• No overall issues detected
- ✓ The media File:Implosion bomb animated.gif is free-use
- ✓ The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 109 characters
- ✓ Hawkeye7 has more than 5 DYK credits. A QPQ review of Template:Did you know nominations/Alice of Champagne was performed for this nomination.
Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 16:09, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
- ALT1 ... that Project Y designed an atomic bomb in which 20 hexagonal and 12 pentagonal explosive lenses (depicted) compress a solid plutonium sphere? EEng
Everything is good to go. I personally prefer the original hook, but have no problem with ALT1 either. The issue noted with citing is because there is a math formula in the section, the other two either were never problems or have been fixed since. Maury Markowitz (talk) 21:18, 15 September 2016 (UTC)