Wikipedia

Template:Did you know nominations/Prusa i3

< Template:Did you know nominations
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:02, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

DYK toolbox

Prusa i3

edit
(
)
[[File:|120x133px|A Prusa i3 3D printer farm producing parts for new printers. ]]
A Prusa i3 3D printer farm producing parts for new printers.

Created by John Cummings (talk). Self-nominated at 15:48, 26 June 2016 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Invalid status "yes" - use one of "y", "?", "maybe", "no" or "again"

  • Another wiki is not a reliable source for DYK hooks. Yoninah (talk) 17:43, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
  • The hook does not use any information from the wiki, the reference from the wiki refers to the fact the printer is part of the RepRap project. The reference for the hook comes from the 3dhubs website, please see the other reference used in the first sentence of the article. John Cummings (talk) 18:10, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
  • I have also changed the image to a short video which demonstrates the self replication process much more clearly. I'm not sure what to change the word pictured to in the description though. John Cummings (talk) 19:58, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
  • Hopefully I've fixed it. Cake (talk) 13:06, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
  • @MisterCake: great, thanks, do you know if I need to change pictured to something else because I've changed to a video? John Cummings (talk) 14:13, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
  • I'm sorry, @John Cummings: I don't see the source you're referring to. The part about it being the most popular printer in the world seems to be sourced to a WP:PRIMARY source, which is in turn citing the 3dhubs source, but the 3dhubs source (assuming it is WP:SECONDARY) is not cited in your article. If you do not have an independent, third-party source for the popularity part of the hook, then we would have to say "which claims to be the most popular 3D printer in the world". I am less concerned about the self-replicating fact, as that could be sourced to the manufacturer (although it is always better to have a third-party source for everything).
  • I suggest tweaking the "(pictured)" to "(replication process pictured)". Yoninah (talk) 19:37, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

@Yoninah:, sorry for the confusion, the reference was a primary source however the information on there was a screengrab from 3D Hubs showing it as the most popular printer. I've added a direct link to 3D Hubs to make this clearer and to get rid of the primary source issue. Thanks for your help John Cummings (talk) 20:18, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

  • Thank you, that's better. But what is the 3D Hubs source telling us? That it is "one of" the most popular printers in the world, or that it outsold the Ultimaker 2 for just one week? Yoninah (talk) 20:30, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi @Yoninah:, its not a measure of sales but a measure of popularity of use on a very large distributed printing service, because the page is dynamic it doesn't record past months, that's why I originally used the primary source. John Cummings (talk) 21:00, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
  • OK, I understand. Hook refs verified and cited inline. I think the original hook reads best. I decided not to add the new "replication process pictured" text because the "(pictured)" part really belongs at the end of the hook. Rest of review per Mister Cake. Good to go. Yoninah (talk) 21:16, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Prusa_i3&oldid=729804333"