The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Overall: A learned and careful article - thank you, Gerda. I think I may have sung the Charpentier with a choir years ago - it sounds familiar. Earwig finds a lot of copyvio, but it is all clear quotation of the psalm, so no problem there. Just one issue: three paras need a citation at the end.Storye book (talk) 15:02, 12 April 2021 (UTC) Storye book (talk) 15:02, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for the review. I found those facts in other articles, and can only hope to find sources there. Too tired, tomorrow. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:31, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Storye book, please check again. I found refs for the two bishops. I wonder what to do about Non nobis, - badly referenced. It's self evident that it's from this first line, and a lot of detail which I would't want to merge all to the psalm article. What can we do? I added the Knights Templars. Flag pictured with the motto on the commons, but not obvious from when, - looks like a logo to me. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:07, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
Ref for the Holst: Gibbs, Alan (15 April 2020). "Not unto us O Lord"(PDF). Holst Newsletter (15). The Holst Society: 2. Retrieved 13 April 2021.
Yes I agree about the Templars image File:Non nobis domine, non nobis, sed nomini tuo da gloriam.jpg. It is likely to be a modern logo (even if derived from an earlier idea) and therefore still potentially under copyright. In my opinion, to prevent possible deletion, that image should be removed to en.wikipedia as a non-free logo. There will be a problem in that it would then have to become a thumbnail image, so that the writing would no longer be readable. If you would like me to move it for you as a non-free logo, I would be happy to do that. I should add that to survive as a non-free image file on en.wikipedia, the image would have to be used for ID on a WP article. Personally, I think that the safest thing is to leave it alone entirely, and not mention it in the Psalm 115 article. Storye book (talk) 10:39, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for digging. The Holst says more about Holst than that he set it (which is referenced already.) Will take it, as Schütz Becker also. I am not at all sure the Charpentier is the right one, could easily be a setting of Psalm 116. Non nobis is for much more than the templars, according to that article. Agree about no templars image. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:37, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
Update: Charpentier moved to Psalm 116, per the Latin beginning, sorry about that. Found a Haydn, instead! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:35, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
Thank you, Gerda! All done, good to go. Storye book (talk) 15:16, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
A learned and careful article - thank you, Gerda. I think I may have sung the Charpentier with a choir years ago - it sounds familiar. Earwig finds a lot of copyvio, but it is all clear quotation of the psalm, so no problem there. 
Thank you, Gerda! All done, good to go. Storye book (talk) 15:16, 13 April 2021 (UTC)