- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:38, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
5x expanded by Yoninah (talk) and Gerda Arendt (talk). Nominated by Gerda Arendt (talk) at 22:46, 25 January 2019 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
Overall: 
Interesting, simple, article. Formatting seems consistent with the Psalms (better than most shorter pages). I appreciate the Background and themes section.
* Inline source for the hook is not explicit ("by several"), however, in Musical settings, I see reasonable citations for Bach's German and Latin pieces.
* In the seven days preceding the nomination on Jan 25, the article was expanded from under 200 character to over 6000 by the (joint) nominator(s).
* Passworded Midrash source accepted in good faith.
* The Hook might read smoother with "to German" and "to Latin".
IveGoneAway (talk) 02:22, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you for the thorough review. No references are needed for the lead where it's only summarized to "several". "to Latin" would imply - for me at least - that it was Bach who translated, but it's simply the text from the mass, and the German was translated by Luther, not by Bach. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:14, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- OK, I get it. IveGoneAway (talk) 15:22, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Interesting, simple, article. Formatting seems consistent with the Psalms (better than most shorter pages). I appreciate the Background and themes section.