Template:Did you know nominations/Queen Anne Pool

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Rjjiii talk 16:10, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Queen Anne Pool

  • ... that Queen Anne Pool opened to the public one day late, after a thermostat glitch which accidentally heated the pool to 100 °F (38 °C)?
Created by Generalissima (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 72 past nominations.

Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 06:08, 16 August 2024 (UTC).

  • Hi Generalissima, review follows: article created 15 August and exceeds minimum length; article is well written and cited inline throughout to reliable sources for the subject; I didn't pick up any issues with overly close paraphrasing from a spotcheck on the sources; hook fact is interesting, mentioned in the article and checks out to the source cited; a QPQ has been carried out. Looks fine to me, a really nice article - Dumelow (talk) 07:14, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
  • pulled per discussion at ERRORS; see Talk:Queen Anne Pool for more details :) theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 23:15, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
  • @Generalissima: Did you address the concerns that caused this hook to be pulled? Is this ready for another review? Z1720 (talk) 23:41, 8 September 2024 (UTC)
I was away during the talk page discussions but for what it's worth I am comfortable with the notability question. The article has since passed a GA review by an experienced reviewer - Dumelow (talk) 06:16, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
@Dumelow: In that case, as the original reviewer, can you indicate if this is approved by adding the green tick? Z1720 (talk) 06:51, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Yes, happy to tick. Would suggest if notability concerns remain it would be best taken to WP:AFD (which would put the DYK process on hold) where it can attract a wider audience - Dumelow (talk) 08:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)