Template:Did you know nominations/Quintinia verdonii
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:17, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Quintinia verdonii
edit
Quintinia verdonii by Margaret Flockton
- ... that the grey possumwood (illustrated) can be a desirable garden plant on account of its flowers?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Sticky Vicky
- Comment: nice antique image.
Created by Casliber (talk) and Filikovalo (talk). Nominated by Casliber (talk) at 09:54, 24 June 2016 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- There is not inline cites in either the "Trunk & branchlets" or "Leaves" sections. - Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
Hook eligibility:
- Cited: - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
- Interesting: - I find this hook very bland. Aren't many plants desirable due to their flowers?
| Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
|---|
|
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall: 
Yellow Dingo (talk) 12:16, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
- @Yellow Dingo: every para has at least one inline cite now. It's pretty hard to think of a hook. I concede that many plants have horticultural potential but many many more don't....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 05:18, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
; ok GTG. - Yellow Dingo (talk) 15:40, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
- @Yellow Dingo: every para has at least one inline cite now. It's pretty hard to think of a hook. I concede that many plants have horticultural potential but many many more don't....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 05:18, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
