- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 17:53, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Quoit brooch
edit
- ... that only about 40 objects in the fifth-century Anglo-Saxon Quoit Brooch Style of metalwork (example pictured) are known?
5x expanded by Johnbod (talk). Self nominated at 00:23, 28 October 2014 (UTC).
Article long enough, expanded over 5x, and fully referenced. Hook short enough, interesting enough, and cited to offline source; image is nominator's own work. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 10:04, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
- Changed "fewer than" to "only about" 40, as one was discovered in 2013, after the ref was published. [1] Johnbod (talk) 21:35, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
- Noted, no problem with the additions to the article or the modified hook. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 13:25, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
-
- There are several inline citations to the fifth century in the article as it stands. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 00:35, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
- There is only one inline cite to "fifth-century" in regard to a specific piece. I think the sentence that needs the cite is: The brooches, and the style, are mainly found in high-status burials in southern-eastern England, south of the Thames, dating from the 5th century. Yoninah (talk) 00:41, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
-
- Noted, no problem with the additions to the article or the modified hook. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 13:25, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
