Template:Did you know nominations/R/antiwork

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 19:13, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

r/antiwork

Created by Ezlev (talk). Self-nominated at 04:55, 12 December 2021 (UTC).

  • Ooh, nice article, ezlev! Article is new enough, long enough, neutral, and plagiarism-free—although I have a problem with the sentence about Sean Black resting on Business Insider, as Insider has a "no consensus" on reliability and I don't think this passes a case-by-case examination on whether this is important enough if only BI has picked it up. For the hooks, I like ALT0 the best—ALT1 is kind of hedged on user reports (and the company denied it), ALTs 2 and 2a are approved, but not as good, and ALTs 3 and 4 seems a little narrow. All the hooks are cited, and you've done a QPQ, so we're almost there! theleekycauldron (talkcontribs) (they/she) 18:38, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Out of curiosity, does the capital R bother you? It bothers the crap out of me. theleekycauldron (talkcontribs) (they/she) 18:42, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
    • theleekycauldron, thanks for the review! I've removed the Sean Black bit and struck alt1. And yes, the R irritates me to no end, and {{lowercase title}} only goes so far... ezlev (user/tlk/ctrbs) 18:59, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
I'm thinking maybe you meant to approve this, leek? ezlev (user/tlk/ctrbs) 04:00, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
I'm thinking along similar lines, ezlev! i'm a little absent-minded, sorry about that :) theleekycauldron (talkcontribs) (they/she) 04:06, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Promoting the main hook to prep 3Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 19:13, 16 December 2021 (UTC)